The moment of a region to an axis is the total (integral) of mass times distance to that axis:
Moment to :
Moment to :
Notice the swap in letters
integrand has factor
integrand has factor
Notice the total mass
If you remove or factors from the integrands, the integrals give total mass .
These formulas are obtained by slicing the region into rectangular strips that are parallel to the axis in question.
The area per strip is then:
— region under
— region between and
— region ‘under’
— region between and
The idea of moment is related to:
Torque balance and angular inertia
Center of mass
The center of mass (CoM) of a solid body is a single point with two important properties:
“average position” of the body
The average position determines an effective center of dynamics. For example, gravity acting on every bit of mass of a rigid body acts the same as a force on the CoM alone.
“balance point” of the body
The net torque (rotational force) about the CoM, generated by a force distributed over the body’s mass, equivalently a force on the CoM, is zero.
Centroid
When the body has uniform density, then the CoM is also called the centroid.
Center of mass from moments
Coordinates of the CoM:
Here is the total mass of the body.
Center of mass from moments - explanation
Notice how these formulas work. The total mass is always . The moment to (for example) is . Dividing these two values:
where .
In other words, through the formula , we find that is the average value of over the region with area .
A downside of the technique above is that to find we needed to convert the region into functions in . This would be hard to do if the region was given as the area under a curve but cannot be found analytically. An alternative formula can help in this situation.
Midpoint of strips for opposite variables
When the region lies between and , we can find with an -integral:
When the region lies between and , we can find with a -integral:
Region under a curve
For the region “under the curve” , just set:
For the region “under the curve” , set:
The idea for these formulas is to treat each vertical strip as a point concentrated at the CoM of the vertical strip itself.
The height to this midpoint is , and the area of the strip is , so the integral becomes .
Midpoint of strips formula - full explanation
If the strip is located at some , with values from up to , then:
The area of the strip is . So the integral formula for can be recast:
If the vertical strips are between and , then the midpoints of the strips are given by the ‘average’ function:
Find the center of mass of the region which combines a rectangle and triangle (as in the figure) by computing separate moments. What are those separate moments? Assume the mass density is .
Solution
(1) Apply symmetry to rectangle:
By symmetry, the center of mass of the rectangle is located at .
Thus and .
(2) Find moments of the rectangle:
Total mass of rectangle . Thus:
(3) Find moments of the triangle:
Area of vertical slice . Distance from -axis . Total integral:
Improper integrals are those for which either a bound or the integrand itself become infinite somewhere on the interval of integration.
Examples:
(a) the upper bound is
(b) the integrand goes to as
(c) the integrand is at the point
The limit interpretation of (a) is this:
The limit interpretation of (b) is this:
The limit interpretation of (c) is this:
These limits are evaluated using the usual methods.
An improper integral is said to be convergent or divergent according to whether it may be assigned a finite value through the appropriate limit interpretation.
Two tools allow us to determine convergence of a large variety of integrals. They are the comparison test and the -integral cases.
Comparison test - integrals
The comparison test says:
When an improper integral converges, every smaller integral converges.
When an improper integral diverges, every bigger integral diverges.
Here, smaller and bigger are comparisons of the integrand at all values (accounting properly for signs), and the bounds are assumed to be the same.
For example, converges, and implies (when ), therefore the comparison test implies that converges.
-integral cases
Assume and . We have:
Proving the -integral cases
It is easy to prove the convergence / divergence of each -integral case using the limit interpretation and the power rule for integrals. (Or for , using .)
Additional improper integral types
The improper integral also has a limit interpretation:
The double improper integral has this limit interpretation:
Where is any finite number. This double integral does not exist if either limit does not exist for any value of .
Double improper is not simultaneous!
Watch out! This may happen:
This simultaneous limit might exist only because of internal cancellation in a case where the separate individual limits do not exist! We do not say ‘convergent’ in these cases!